The zdelta-1.0 Experimental Results




Experimental results comparing zdelta against vcdiff, xdelta, and gzip.
Three different classes of experiments are presented here.
The experiments presented here were conducted on machines with the following configurations: For more information on the conducted experiments refer to the results section of zdelta: an Efficient Delta Compression Tool.

Experiment 1


gcc size MachineI compress MachineI decompress MachineII compress MachineII decompress MachineIII compress MachineIII decompress
uncompressed 27289 - - - - - -
gzip 7563 31 18 13 9.0 48 29
xdelta 462 21 15 6.8 5.0 36 29
vcdiff 290 33 16 20 8.9 55 26
zdelta (STDIO) 251 34 17 15 8.8 56 28
zdelta (direct) 251 27 9.6 8.6 2.7 42 17

Compressed sizes and running times for the gcc files (sizes in KB and times in seconds)


emacs size MachineI compress MachineI decompress MachineII compress MachineII decompress MachineIII compress MachineIII decompress
uncompressed 27327 - - - - - -
gzip 8577 36 22 16 12 56 37
xdelta 2132 30 21 10 7.0 51 38
vcdiff 1822 35 21 20 11 58 34
zdelta (STDIO) 1466 44 22 19 11 69 36
zdelta (direct) 1466 35 12 11 3.4 55 22

Compressed sizes and running times for the emacs files (sizes in KB and times in seconds)



Experiment 2




Compressed size (in KB) versus file similarity




Compression time (in seconds) versus file similarity




Decompression time (in seconds) versus file similarity



Experiment 3




Compression time (in seconds) versus file size




Decompression time (in seconds) versus file size

Copyright © Dimitre Trendafilov 2002.
dtrend01@utopia.poly.edu